TMCNet:  Collection of Information; Proposed Extension of Approval; Comment Request-- Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database

[August 15, 2013]

Collection of Information; Proposed Extension of Approval; Comment Request– Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database

Aug 15, 2013 (FIND, Inc. via COMTEX) — SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC or Commission) requests comments on a proposed extension of approval of a collection of information for the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database. The Commission will consider all comments received in response to this notice before requesting an extension of approval of this collection of information from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

DATES: The Office of the Secretary must receive comments not later than October 15, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CPSC-2010- 0041, by any of the following methods: Electronic Submissions: Submit electronic comments to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. The Commission does not accept comments submitted by electronic mail (email), except through www.regulations.gov. The Commission encourages you to submit electronic comments by using the Federal eRulemaking Portal, as described above.

[Page Number 49731] Written Submissions: Submit written submissions in the following way: Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions), preferably in five copies, to: Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) 504-7923.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number for this notice. All comments received may be posted without change, including any personal identifiers, contact information, or other personal information provided, to: https://www.regulations.gov. Do not submit confidential business information, trade secret information, or other sensitive or protected information that you do not want to be available to the public. If furnished at all, such information should be submitted in writing.

Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to: https://www.regulations.gov, and insert the docket number, CPSC-2010-0041, into the "Search" box, and follow the prompts.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information contact: Robert H. Squibb, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 504-7815, or by email to: [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Background Section 212 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA) added section 6A to the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA), which requires the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC or Commission) to establish and maintain a publicly available, searchable database on the safety of consumer products and other products or substances regulated by the Commission (Database). Among other things, section 6A of the CPSA requires the Commission to collect reports of harm from the public for potential publication in the publicly available Database and to collect and publish comments about reports of harm from manufacturers.

On May 24, 2010, the Commission published a proposed rule on the Database and announced that a proposed collection of information in conjunction with the Database had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.75 FR 29156. The Commission issued a final rule on the Database on December 9, 2010 (75 FR 76832). The final rule interprets various statutory requirements in section 6A of the CPSA pertaining to the information to be included in the Database and also establishes provisions regarding submitting reports of harm; providing notice of reports of harm to manufacturers; publishing reports of harm and manufacturer comments in the Database; and dealing with confidential and materially inaccurate information.

OMB approved the collection of information for the Database under control number 3041-0146. OMB's approval will expire on January 31, 2014. The Commission now proposes to request an extension of approval of this collection of information.

B. Information Collected Through the Database The primary purpose of this information collection is to populate the publicly searchable Database of consumer product safety information mandated by section 6A of the CPSA. There are four components to the information collection: Reports of harm, manufacturer comments, branding information, and the Small Batch Manufacturer Registry (SBMR).

Reports of Harm: Reports of harm communicate information regarding an injury, illness, or death, or any risk (as determined by the Commission) of injury, illness, or death, relating to the use of a consumer product. Reports can be submitted to the CPSC by consumers; local, state, or federal government agencies; health care professionals; child service providers; public safety entities; and others. Reports may be submitted in one of three ways: Via the CPSC Web site (www.SaferProducts.gov), by telephone via a CPSC call center, or by email, fax, or mail, using the incident report form (available for download or printing via the CPSC Web site). Reports may also originate as a free-form letter or email. Submitters must consent to inclusion of their report of harm in the publicly searchable Database.

Manufacturer Comments: A manufacturer or private labeler may submit a comment related to a report of harm if the report of harm identifies the manufacturer or private labeler and the CPSC transmits such report of harm to the manufacturer. Manufacturers' comments may be submitted through the business portal, by email, mail, or fax. The business portal is a feature of the Database that allows manufacturers who register on the business portal to receive reports of harm and comment on such reports through the business portal. Use of the business portal expedites the receipt of reports of harm and business response times.

A manufacturer may request that the Commission designate information in a report of harm as confidential. Such a request may be made using the business portal, email, mail, or fax. Additionally, any person or entity reviewing a report of harm or a manufacturer's comment (either before or after publication in the Database) and who believes that the report contains materially inaccurate information, may request that the report or comment, or portions of the report or comment, be excluded from the Database. Such a request may be submitted by email, mail, or fax, and registered businesses also may utilize the business portal for such requests.

Branding Information: Using the business portal, registered businesses may voluntarily submit branding information to assist CPSC in correctly and timely routing reports of harm. Brand names may be licensed to an entity other than the manufacturer. CPSC's accurate understanding of applicable licensing arrangements relating to consumer products increases the likelihood that the correct manufacturer is timely notified regarding a report of harm.

Small Batch Manufacturers Registry: The business portal also contains the SBMR, which is the online mechanism by which small batch manufacturers (as defined in the CPSA) can identify themselves to obtain relief from certain third party testing requirements for children's products. To register as a small batch manufacturer and receive relief from third party testing, a business must attest that the company's total gross revenue and the number of units of the covered product manufactured both fall within the statutory limits.

C. Estimated Burden 1. Estimated Annual Burden for Respondents We estimate the burden of this collection of information as follows: [Page Number 49732] Table 1–Estimated Annual Reporting Burden for Reports of Harm Collection type Number of Response Total Minutes per Total respondents frequency annual response burden, in *1 responses hours *2 Reports of Harm– 8,030 1.02 8,207 12 1,641 submitted through Web site Reports of Harm– 3,749 1.00 3,749 10 625 submitted by phone Reports of Harm– 904 6.71 6,067 20 2,022 submitted by mail, e-mail, fax Total 12,683 18,023 4,288 *1 Frequency of responses is calculated by dividing the number of responses by the number of respondents.

*2 Numbers have been rounded.

Table 2–Estimated Annual Reporting Burden for Manufacturer Submissions Collection type Number of Response Total Minutes per Total respondents frequency annual response burden, in *1 responses hours *2 Manufacturer 624 8.20 5,117 116 9,893 Comments– submitted through Web site Manufacturer 132 1.25 165 146 402 Comments– submitted by mail, email, fax Requests to Treat 11 1.27 14 15 4 Information as Confidential– submitted through Web site Requests to Treat 0 0 0 45 0 Information as Confidential– submitted by mail, email, fax Requests to Treat 231 2.46 568 438 4,146 Information as Materially Inaccurate– submitted through Web site Requests to Treat 83 1.25 104 468 811 Information as Materially Inaccurate– submitted by mail, email, fax Voluntary Brand 545 2.25 1,227 10 205 Identification Small Batch 578 1 578 10 96 Manufacturer Identification Total 2,204 7,773 15,557 Using the data in Tables 1 and 2 above, we estimate the annual reporting cost to be $1,086,332. This estimate is based on the sum of two estimated total figures for reports of harm and manufacturer submissions. The estimated number of respondents and responses are based on the actual responses received in FY 2012. We assume that the number of responses and respondents will be similar in future years.

Reports of Harm: Table 1 sets forth the data used to estimate the burden associated with submitting reports of harm. We had previously estimated the time associated with the electronic and telephone submission of reports of harm at 12 and 10 minutes, respectively, and because we have had no indication that these estimates are not appropriate or accurate, we used those figures for present purposes as well. We estimate that the time associated with a paper or PDF form would be 20 minutes, on average.

To estimate the costs for submitting reports of harm, we multiplied the estimated total burden hours associated with reports of harm (1,641 hours + 625 hours + 2,022 hours = 4,288 hours) by an estimated total compensation for all workers in private industry of $29.13 per hour, *3 which results in an estimated cost of $124,909 (4,288 hours x $29.13 per hour = $124,909).

*3 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Table 9 of the Employer Costs for Employee Compensation (ECEC), Private Industry, goods- producing and service-providing industries, by occupational group, March 2013 (data extracted on 07/24/2013 from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t09.htm.

Manufacturer Submissions: Table 2 sets forth the data used to estimate the burden associated with manufacturers' submissions to the Database. To gain information on how long it takes a manufacturer to submit a general comment or a claim that a report contains materially inaccurate information through the business portal, we contacted six businesses registered on the business portal. We asked each company how long it typically takes to research, compose, and enter a comment or a claim of materially inaccurate information. We had observed that a large percentage of the general comments come from a few businesses and assumed that the experience of a business that submits many comments each year would be different from one that submits only a few. Accordingly, we divided all responding businesses into three groups based on the number of general comments submitted in FY 2012, and then selected two businesses from each group to contact. The first group we contacted consisted of businesses that submitted 50 or more comments in FY 2012, accounting for 46 percent of all general comments received. The second group we contacted included businesses that submitted 6 to 49 comments, accounting for 36 percent of all general comments received. The last group contacted included businesses that submitted no more than five comments, accounting for 18 percent of all general comments received.

To estimate the burden associated with submitting a general comment regarding a report of harm through the business portal, we averaged the burden provided by each company within each group and then calculated a weighted average from the three groups, weighting each group by the proportion of comments received from that group. We found that the average time to submit a general comment regarding a report of harm is 116 minutes based on the data in Table 3 (((10 minutes + 180 minutes)/2 companies)*.46 + ((10 minutes + 30 minutes)/2 companies)*.36 + ((240 minutes + 480 minutes)/2 companies)*.18 = 116 minutes).

[Page Number 49733] Table 3–Estimated Burden To Enter a General Comment in the Database Group Company General comments (minutes) Group 1 Company A 10 (>= 50 comments) Company B 180 Group 2 Company A 10 (6-49 comments) Company B 30 Group 3 Company A 240 (<= 5 comments) Company B 480 Registered businesses generally submit comments through our Web site. Unregistered businesses submit comments by mail, email, or fax. We estimate that submitting comments in this way takes a little longer because we often must ask the businesses to amend their submissions to include the required certifications. Thus, we estimated that, on average, comments submitted by mail, email, or fax take 30 minutes longer than those submitted through our Web site (116 minutes + 30 minutes = 146 minutes).

The submission of a claim of materially inaccurate information is a relatively rare event for all respondents, so we averaged all responses together. Four of the businesses contacted had submitted claims of materially inaccurate information during FY 2012. We found that the average time to submit a claim that a report of harm contains a material inaccuracy is 438 minutes ((10 minutes + 120 minutes + 180 minutes + 1440 minutes)/4 companies = 438 minutes).

Registered businesses generally submit claims through the business portal. Unregistered businesses submit claims by mail, email, or fax. We estimate that submitting claims in this way takes a little longer because we often must ask the businesses to amend their submissions to include the required certifications. Thus, we estimated that on average, claims submitted by mail, email, or fax take 30 minutes longer than those submitted through our Web site (438 minutes + 30 minutes = 468 minutes).

We previously had estimated that confidential information claims submitted through our Web site would take 15 minutes because the information to be entered would be readily accessible by the respondent. We have found that confidential information claims are very rare, and the few such claims that we have received have been submitted through our Web site. That limited experience did not suggest the need for any update of the estimate for Web site submission of confidential information claims. Although we have not received any confidential information claims by mail, email, or fax, based on our experience with comments and claims of materially inaccurate information, we estimate that a confidential information claim submitted by mail, email, or fax would take 30 minutes longer than those submitted through our Web site (15 minutes + 30 minutes = 45 minutes).

For voluntary brand identification, we estimate that a response would take 10 minutes, on average. Most responses consist only of the brand name and a product description. In many cases a business will submit multiple entries in a brief period of time, and we can see from the date and time stamps on these records that an entry often takes less than two minutes. CPSC staff enters the same data in a similar form based on our own research, and that experience was also factored into our estimate.

For small batch manufacturer identification, we estimate that a response would take 10 minutes, on average. The form consists of three check boxes, and the information should be readily accessible to the respondent.

The responses summarized in Table 2 are generally submitted by manufacturers. To avoid underestimating the cost associated with the collection of this data, we assigned the higher hourly wage associated with a manager or professional in goods-producing industries to these tasks. To estimate the cost of manufacturer submissions, we multiplied the estimated total burden hours in Table 2 (15,557 hours) by an estimated total compensation for a manager or professional in goods-producing industries of $61.80 per hour, *4 which results in an estimated cost of $961,423 (15,557 hours x $61.80 per hour = $961,423).

*4 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Table 9 of the Employer Costs for Employee Compensation (ECEC), Private Industry, goods- producing and service-providing industries, by occupational group, March 2013 (data extracted on 07/24/2013 from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t09.htm.

Therefore, the total estimated annual cost to respondents is $1,086,332 ( $124,909 burden for reports of harm + $961,423 burden for manufacturer submissions = $1,086,332).

2. Estimated Annual Burden on Government We estimate the annualized cost to the CPSC to be $1,028,794. This figure is based on the costs for four categories of work for the Database: Reports of Harm, Materially Inaccurate Information Claims, Manufacturer Comments, and Small Batch Identification. Each category is described below. No government cost is associated with Voluntary Brand Identification because this information is entered directly into the Database by the manufacturer with no processing required by the government. The information assists the government in directing reports of harm to the correct manufacturer. We did not attempt to calculate separately the government cost for claims of confidential information because the number of claims is so small. The time to process these claims is included with claims of materially inaccurate information.

Reports of Harm: The Reports of Harm category includes many different tasks. Some costs related to this category are from a data entry contract. Tasks related to this contract include clerical coding of the report, such as identifying the type of consumer product reported and the appropriate associated hazard, as well as performing quality control on the data in the report. The contractor spends an estimated 3,380 hours per year performing these tasks. With an hourly rate of $32.57 for contracter services, the annual cost to the government is $110,087.

The Reports of Harm category also includes sending consent for reports when necessary, processing that consent when CPSC receives it, determining whether a product is out of CPSC's jurisdiction, and checking that pictures and attachments do not have any personally identifiable information. The Reports category also entails notifying manufacturers when one of their products is reported, completing a risk of harm determination form for every report eligible for publication, referring some reports to a Subject Matter Expert (SME) within the CPSC for a determination on whether the reports meet the requirement of having a risk of harm, and determining whether a report meets all the statutory and regulatory requirements for publication. Detailed costs are described in Table 4.

[Page Number 49734] Table 4–Estimated Costs for Reports of Harm Task Grade level Number of hours Total Total annual cost (annual) compensation per hour Contract 3380 $32.57 $110,086.60 7 1560 33.03 51,526.80 9 832 40.53 33,720.96 12 6396 58.78 375,956.88 13 884 69.67 61,588.28 14 2053 82.60 169,577.80 15 421 96.84 40,769.64 Total 12146 843,226.96 Materially Inaccurate Information (MII) Claims: The MII Claims category includes reviewing and responding to claims, participating in meetings where the claims are discussed, and completing a risk of harm determination on reports when a company alleges that a report does not describe a risk of harm. Detailed costs are described in Table 5.

Table 5–Estimated Costs for MII Claims Task Grade level Number of hours Total Total annual cost (annual) compensation per hour 12 364 $58.78 $21,395.92 13 1040 69.67 72,456.80 14 378 82.60 31,222.80 15 151 96.84 14,622.84 SES 104 103.91 10,806.64 Total 2037 150,505 Manufacturer Comments: The Comments category includes reviewing and accepting or rejecting comments. Detailed costs are described in Table 6.

Table 6–Estimated Costs for Manufacturer Comments Task Grade level Number of hours Total Total annual cost (annual) compensation per hour 12 104 $58.78 $6,113.12 13 182 69.67 12,679.94 Total 286 18,793.06 Small Batch Manufacturer Identification: The Small Batch Manufacturer Identification category includes time spent posting the list of small batch registrations, as well as answering manufacturers' questions on registering as a Small Batch company and what the implications to that company of small batch registration. Detailed costs are described in Table 7.

Table 7–Estimated Costs for Small Batch Task Grade level Number of hours Total Total annual cost (annual) compensation per hour 15 168 $96.84 $16,269.12 Total 168 16,269.12 [Page Number 49735] We estimate the annualized cost to the CPSC of $1,028,794 by adding the four categories of work related to the Database summarized in Tables 4 through 7 (Reports of Harm ( $843,226.96) + MII Claims ( $150,505.00) + Manufacturer Comments ( $18,793.06) + Small Batch Identification ( $16,269.12) = $1,028,794.14).

This information collection renewal request based on an estimated 19,845 burden hours per year for the Database is a decrease of 17,284 hours since this collection of information was last approved by OMB in 2011. The decrease in burden is due primarily to the fact that the number of responses estimated in our original request overstated the number of actual responses submitted; we thus lowered the estimated number of responses based on actual experience since the original request.

D. Request for Comments The Commission solicits written comments from all interested persons about the proposed collection of information. The Commission specifically solicits information relevant to the following topics: . Whether the collection of information described above is necessary for the proper performance of the Commission's functions, particularly with respect to the Database, including whether the information would have practical utility; . Whether the estimated burden of the proposed collection of information is accurate; . Whether the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected could be enhanced; and . Whether the burden imposed by the collection of information could be minimized by use of automated, electronic, or other technological collection techniques, or other forms of information technology.

Dated: August 12, 2013.

Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.

[FR Doc. 2013-19858 Filed 8-14-13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6355-01-P Vol. 78, No. 158 [Docket No. CPSC-2010-0041] Notices

[ Back To HTML5’s Homepage ]






HTML5 RESOURCES

HTML 5 Demos and Examples

HTML 5 experimentation and demos I’ve hacked together. Click on the browser support icon or the technology tag to filter the demos…. Learn More

HTML5 GAMES

HTML5games.com is the largest and most comprehensive directory of HTML5 games on the internet… Learn More

The HTML5 test

How well does your browser support HTML5?… Learn More

Working Draft (WHATWG)

This is the Editor’s Draft from WHATWG. You can use it online or print the available PDF version… Learn More

HTML5 Flip Book

Free jQuery and HTML5 flip book maker for PDF to online page turning book conversion… Learn More